DeepSeek R1: A Complete Review of the Reasoning Model That Shocked the Industry
The Chinese model DeepSeek R1 matched OpenAI o1 at a 30x lower cost. We break down its architecture, benchmarks, how to run it locally, and what it means for the AI market.

DeepSeek R1: A Complete Review of the Reasoning Model That Shocked the Industry
In January 2026, the AI world is still talking about DeepSeek R1 — a reasoning model from China that matches OpenAI o1 but costs 30 times less. This week the company updated its technical documentation, expanding it from 22 to 86 pages. Here's everything you need to know about DeepSeek R1.
What Is DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 is a reasoning model developed by the Chinese company DeepSeek. Its defining feature: the model "thinks out loud" before giving an answer, which lets it solve complex problems that require multi-step reasoning.
Two Versions of the Model
- DeepSeek-R1-Zero — the base model, trained purely with reinforcement learning (RL), without supervised fine-tuning
- DeepSeek-R1 — the full version, with cold-start data and improved readability
What "Reasoning" Means
Regular LLMs answer right away, without "thinking." Reasoning models first generate a chain of reasoning (chain of thought) and only then formulate an answer. This is especially effective for:
- Math problems
- Algorithm design
- Logic puzzles
- Scientific calculations
- Formal proofs
Benchmarks: On Par with OpenAI o1
According to DeepSeek's official data and independent tests:
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI o1 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2024 | 79.8% | 79.2% | 13.4% |
| MATH-500 | 97.3% | 96.4% | 76.6% |
| Codeforces | 96.3% (percentile) | 96.6% | 23.0% |
| GPQA Diamond | 71.5% | 75.7% | 49.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 49.2% | 48.9% | 33.2% |
What These Numbers Mean
- AIME — American Invitational Mathematics Examination, some of the hardest math problems around
- MATH-500 — a standard benchmark of math ability
- Codeforces — competitive programming
- GPQA Diamond — difficult PhD-level science questions
- SWE-bench — real-world bug-fixing tasks in open-source projects
DeepSeek R1 has practically caught up with o1 on every key metric.
Price: 30x Cheaper Than o1
Here's why the industry is in shock:
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI o1 | $15.00 | $60.00 |
| DeepSeek R1 | $0.55 | $2.19 |
| DeepSeek R1 (cache hit) | $0.14 | $2.19 |
Savings: With heavy usage, DeepSeek R1 cuts your API budget by up to 97%.
Why It's So Cheap
- Efficient architecture — MoE (Mixture of Experts) activates only the parameters it needs
- Inference optimization — advanced caching techniques
- Chinese resources — cheaper compute and engineers
- Market-capture strategy — low-margin pricing to attract users
How It Works: The Technical Architecture
The updated documentation (86 pages) reveals the details.
Multi-Stage Training Pipeline
DeepSeek R1 is trained in several stages:
Stage 1: Cold-Start Data The model receives initial reasoning examples from human experts. This helps set the right "style" of thinking.
Stage 2: Reinforcement Learning The main stage. The model learns to reason through RL, receiving rewards for correct answers. Interestingly, DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained ONLY with RL, with no cold-start data, and still delivered impressive results.
Stage 3: Rejection Sampling The model generates many reasoning variants, and the best ones are selected for further training.
Stage 4: Supervised Fine-Tuning Final polishing on the selected examples to improve readability and stability.
R1-Zero's Problems
The documentation is candid about the problems of the version trained without cold-start data:
- Endless repetition — the model sometimes gets stuck in loops
- Poor readability — the reasoning is hard for a human to follow
- Language mixing — it mixes languages within a single answer
R1 (the full version) fixes these problems thanks to the cold-start data.
Distilled Versions
DeepSeek released 6 "lightweight" versions of R1:
| Model | Parameters | Quality vs. R1 | Runs locally on |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | 1.5B | ~60% | Phone |
| R1-Distill-Qwen-7B | 7B | ~75% | RTX 3060 |
| R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | 14B | ~82% | RTX 3080 |
| R1-Distill-Qwen-32B | 32B | ~88% | RTX 4090 |
| R1-Distill-Llama-8B | 8B | ~78% | RTX 3070 |
| R1-Distill-Llama-70B | 70B | ~95% | 2x RTX 4090 |
Knowledge distillation is a process in which a small model learns to imitate the behavior of a large one. The distilled versions retain most of R1's capabilities but run on ordinary hardware.
How to Run It Locally
With Ollama (the easiest way)
Install Ollama and run:
# 7B version (needs ~8GB VRAM)
ollama run deepseek-r1:7b
# 32B version (needs ~24GB VRAM)
ollama run deepseek-r1:32b
# 70B version (needs ~48GB VRAM)
ollama run deepseek-r1:70b
With vLLM (for production)
vLLM delivers high throughput:
pip install vllm
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server \
--model deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B \
--tensor-parallel-size 2
With Hugging Face
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_name = "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_name,
torch_dtype="auto",
device_map="auto"
)
# Important: use a special prompt for reasoning tasks
prompt = "<think>\n" # Start of the reasoning block
Practical Applications
Where R1 Beats Regular LLMs
- Math and physics — solving olympiad-level problems
- Algorithms — writing complex algorithms with proofs of correctness
- Code review — deep analysis of logic errors
- Research — help with scientific work
Where Regular Models Are a Better Fit
- Simple tasks — for "write an email," reasoning is overkill
- Creative work — storytelling, copywriting
- When speed is critical — reasoning takes time
- Chatbots — users don't want to wait while the model "thinks"
Censorship and Restrictions
DeepSeek is a Chinese company, and the model has built-in restrictions:
- Refuses to discuss politically sensitive topics (Taiwan, Tiananmen)
- Promotes the PRC's position on certain issues
- Censors content that is banned in China
The distilled versions (especially the Llama-based ones) have fewer restrictions because they are built on Western models.
Impact on the Industry
For OpenAI
DeepSeek R1 is a serious blow to OpenAI's business model. If you can get reasoning 30 times cheaper, why pay for o1?
Possible responses:
- Lower prices for o1
- Faster development of o2
- A focus on enterprise features (security, compliance)
For Open Source
R1 proves that frontier models can be open. This:
- Accelerates research
- Democratizes access to AI
- Reduces dependence on Big Tech
For Developers
More choice, lower prices, more possibilities. Recommendations:
- Test R1 on your own tasks
- Compare it with o1 on quality and price
- Consider running it locally for private data
Conclusion
DeepSeek R1 is one of the most significant models of 2025-2026. It proved that:
- Reasoning is available to everyone — not just OpenAI subscribers paying $200/month
- Open source is competitive — MIT license, full access to the weights
- China is a serious player — despite sanctions and restrictions on GPUs
- Prices will keep falling — competition is forcing everyone to cut margins
Recommendation: Try DeepSeek R1 on your own tasks. Start with the API (cheap) or a distilled version (free to run locally).
Rate this article
0 reactions📬 Get new guides first
Once a week, no spam
📚 Related articles

World Models: What They Are and Why Everyone Is Working on Them in 2026
LeCun is leaving Meta to build World Models, Google is advancing Genie, and World Labs is raising billions. Here's what World Models are and why they're the next frontier of AI.

CoSAI: 40 MCP Security Threats — How to Protect AI Agents
The Coalition for Secure AI has released a white paper on Model Context Protocol security: 40 threats across 12 categories, zero-trust principles, and practical recommendations.

How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Tasks in 2026
GPT-5, Claude Opus, Gemini Ultra, DeepSeek, Llama: which model should you pick? A practical guide with recommendations by task, budget and requirements.
Comments (0)
💬
No comments yet. Be the first!
Not sure which tool fits you?
Answer seven quick questions and get a tool matched to your tasks, budget and level.
Take the quiz